Whilst listening to the soundtrack of Avenue Q, I mused to Tiffany, why is the term “Orientals” offensive?
To which no solid answer was given, other than oriental refers to objects. This sounds rather made up to me, much like the difference between hanged and hung.
Being the curious fellow I am, I went searching for answers and ended up at wikipedia. Again nothing solid was given, but I did learn something new. The oriental vs asian distinction is only an American problem. Canada, always slightly behind, is moving towards making the term oriental offensive.
The UK, or in this case, the originators of our language, is another story completely. Asian refers to the India region, and Oriental refers to anyone good at math (with no negative connotation).
I of course don’t really care, though I do find older people are most likely to use the term oriental (including my dad). Maybe I will make a shirt. It will be yellow and have the words “oriental is the new colored”. I would never wear this shirt in public but it would be nice to have.
Back to Avenue Q. Had high comedic expectations for this and was disappointed. It was good, but there’s just so many little flaws that I couldn’t love it. The premise: puppets (and humans) address their post-college malaise problems Sesame Street style. Problems with show:
1. It doesn’t feel like a Broadway show. There are not many Broadway shows focused on comedy, and maybe there’s a reason for that. When people pay 50-75 bucks for a seat, they usually don’t want to just laugh, they want to be inspired. Also, the show has an odd overstacking of puppeteers, with 4 puppeteers responsible for ~8 puppets. 2 pairs of puppets are voiced by the same puppeteer, so there’s some confusing who’s saying what times. This is a Broadway show, why not pay for a few more puppeteers?
2. Second act is flat. Sadly the way Avenue Q is like a Broadway show is it sets up problems (Act I) and then tries to resolve everything by dragging it out in song (Act II). The overall charm of AQ (I call it that now) is when the characters are working together and singing about problems, etc. Act I is a delightful romp, but Act II the characters are all over the place and mostly not on stage at the same time. It’s like being in a desert and crawling towards the oasis of everyone get back together and sing. Also, the greatest characters in Broadway history, the Bad Idea Bears, light up the first act then pretty much disappear for the second.
3. Song chemisty is not found. Most of the songs individually are good songs, but they don’t really sum up to anything great. It’s like they made a list of topics they wanted to talk about and wrote a song about each one, then came up with a plot to shoehorn in there. Even the soundtrack sounds more like a “Best of” album as opposed to an actual album.
4. (minor) Not racy enough? AQ toes the line of appropriateness, but maybe they should have just crushed it instead. You’re showing puppets having sex, so you’re half way there already. The old Chappelle’s show has a skit with puppets singing about drugs and STDs. I actually didn’t find it that funny but who knows, base a whole show on that and blend in some other things and you have more profit.
That said the show was entertaining, but in a pop culture kind of way. If that’s what they were going for, then job well done. It’s no Jersey Boys though.